DOS 2018

202 · DOS Abstracts Closed Incision Negative Wound Pressure Therapy in Atraumatic Major Amputations Charlotte Packroff Stenqvist, Camilla Toft Nielsen, Bo Madvig Larsen, Mitchell James Flies, Ditte Brander, Per Pallesen Orthopedic Surgery, Nykøbing Falster Hospital Background: Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy(ciNPWT) has been shown clinically effective in wound treatment of high-risk wounds after severe skeletal trauma and in arthroplasty revision surgery but still there are no specific indications for ciNPWT. Purpose / Aim of Study: The purpose of this study was to identify if the use of ciNPWT with “Prevena” reduces wound revision surgery in major lower (above ankle) atraumatic amputations. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort quality study at Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Region Sjaelland identifying al major amputations from 2010-2017. Patients amputated due to tumours were excluded. CiNPWT with “Prevena” was implemented on 1. June 2014 and defines the transition between the control group (2010-2013) and the intervention group (2015- 2017). Differences between the groups were analysed using the Chi-Squared test and unpaired parametric t-test with Welch correction. Statistical signifi- cance level was chosen to p <0.05. Findings / Results: We found 161 patients in the intervention group and 179 patients in the control group. Patients in the intervention group were signif- icantly younger (73.2 ± 9.6) compared to the control group (77.9 ± 11.6), p<0.001. Both groups were comparable in terms of gender as well as the pres- ence of diabetes and complicated wounds. We found 24 patients who needed revision in the intervention group (14.8%) and 29 (15.8%) in the control group in the immediate postoperative period of 2 months (p=0.79). Conclusions: We didn’t find any reduced rate of revision surgery in our study in patients treated with ciNPWT in the immediate postoperative days, but pa- tients receiving ciNPWT tend to go through fewer operative procedures. More research in ciNPWT in this field of use is needed. 143.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NjEzNTY=